"What do you want for supper?"
"Whatever you want is fine, hon."
"Well, I don't know. What do you suggest?"
"Seriously, I have no bent toward one thing or the other. Whatever you feel like having is fine."
"But, I don't know what I want. That's why I'm asking you."
"Doesn't matter."
"Doesn't matter?
"Yeah."
"Just like it doesn't matter that you forgot to take out the garbage that one night two years ago."
"Oh, here we go.........."
"And I had to run outside in the freezing cold to flag down the garbage truck...."
"Hon, that was two years ago and.........."
"..........and I was in my bathrobe and nearly froze to death....."
"Hon, I apologized for that on the same day........"
"......and I slipped on the ice and nearly broke......."
"LET'S HAVE PIZZA!"
".......my neck, and then......Pizza? Oooooo, that sounds good! Where should we get it from?"
"Doesn't matter"
"Doesn't matter?!"
"Wait...NOOOOOOOO!!!!"
And so on and so forth.
Anyway, I'm pretty easy going. But, I do have my nit picky moments (as the post topic would, indeed, suggest). For instance, if I have read a book I prefer the cinematic adaptaion to be as close to said literary work as possible. Case in point, I was apalled at the "artistic liberties" that were taken with this summer's offering of "Prince Caspian".
There are more atrocites than I care to remember so I'll just map out the main three.
1. The fight at the train station - Uhhhhhh........where the flip did this come from. Apparently we needed some teen angst.
2. The (almost) return of the White Witch - Okay, let's quickly scan the 108 pages of the book and find where this happened.....it didn't at all???? Oh, but we just had to include it in the movie just in case we had forgotten about her from the first film. No, we couldn't possibly wait until "The Magicians Nephew" to see her again.
3. The Kiss - You know, I was listening to a movie review podcast the other day. Their gripe with this part of the film was that the love interest was "underdeveloped". I beg to differ. The problem with the love angle here is that it shouldn't have been there at all! Seriously, did the director even glance at the source material? In no way, shape, or form does a love interest develop between Caspian and Susan. Just aggravating.
I will say one thing in defense of this film.........Prince Caspian is, in fact, the correct film to be made after "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe". This is true in the very same way the the first film was correctly chosen to open this series.
Confused? Let me explain.
Sometime during the late 1990's someone got the "brilliant" idea to market "The Chronicles of Narnia" chornologically. So, a whole generation of readers have grown up with the series in this order:
1. The Magician's Nephew
2. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
3. A Horse and His Boy
4. Prince Caspian
5. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
6. The Silver Chair
7. The Last Battle
RUBBISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
C.S. Lewis wrote the books in his chosen order for a reason. That order would be.....
1. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
2. Prince Caspian
3. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
4. The Silver Chair
5. A Horse and His Boy
6. The Magician's Nephew
7. The Last Battle
To put this into perspective, imagine viewing the Star Wars films for the first time in chornological order (HERESY!!!). Once Vader spills the beans to Luke the viewer would find themselves saying, "Well, duh! We found that out in Episode III." The same principle applies to this series of books. At the very least, the films seem to be occuring in the correct order.
Alright. That's enough. I've griped long enough.
WOW! Yes, I would LOVE to come over for dinner. What are we having? Doesn't matter??!!!!